I haven't written a blog here for a loooong time. I know that when I write I tend to think more clearly and be more focused on all areas in life. So, I thought I'd write a little something today about a new TV show I'm really liking.
Julie and I have been watching the show
Once Upon A Time every week because we were huge
LOST fans and heard that 2 of the guys from the
LOST writing team had created the show. So far we have really enjoyed the show and along with
Person of Interest, it is one of the best new shows this year. Both of the shows have lots of connections to
LOST, which got me watching both in the first place, but I really like the shows even without the connections and they are my two favorite shows, new or returning, right now.
Once Upon A Time is a really long title, so I'm going to refer to it as
OUAT. Here are a few reasons I've been liking
OUAT.
1. LOST. I've already mentioned this one a few times. For some reason you have to all-caps the title when you're talking about
LOST. The first thing you notice about
OUAT is that the font for the logo is the same font (and all caps) as
LOST. Also, as I mentioned, it has the same writers. They have done a nice job of hiding references to
LOST in
OUAT.
For example, in the pilot of the new show, the clock in the town read "8:15," which is a reference to the flight number from
LOST. Emma (the hero) wakes up and the camera is up-close on her eye, just like it was in the pilot of
LOST when Jack woke up. Also, the mayor's address is "108," which was the most significant number in
LOST (the number from the hatch, and the total of 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42 added together). 2 episodes ago, they had the candy bar from
LOST making a cameo, and last night, they had the MacCutcheon Whiskey from
LOST making a cameo. I'm sure there are other easter eggs I am either forgetting or didn't notice.
More significantly, the storytelling is similar to
LOST. The show is based on flashbacks from one world to another one. In
LOST, the story flashed back from the fantastical life on the island to "real life" in the normal world. In
OUAT, the show flashes back from "real life" in the normal world to "fantastical life" in the fairy tale world. This really is essentially the same show as
LOST as far as storytelling devices go.
2. References to classic stories I love: Narnia, and Lord of the Rings. LOST had references to
Narnia. So I wasn't surprised that the writers continued to make references to it from the beginning of
OUAT. First off, the first doorway between the two worlds is a
wardrobe. In the pilot episode, the main character, Emma, is placed in a wardrobe as a baby and magically whisked away to the real world. A more subtle, but more important contribution of
Narnia is the entire premise of the show. J.R.R. Tolkien told C.S. Lewis that
Narnia was ridiculous because it incorporated too many children's stories into one universe. C.S. Lewis said that there already was a place where all those different characters co-existed: our minds.
OUAT follows Lewis in creating a universe where all the fairy tale characters co-exist, with multiple crossovers between their stories.
Speaking of Tolkien, there have been some references to
Lord of the Rings already too. In the first couple of episodes, Rumpelstiltskin was established as the show's version of Gollum. Obviously, the character looks a lot like the Gollum from Peter Jackson's movies, and that is surely no accident. More importantly, Rumpelstiltskin used the word "precious" in the second episode and said it in a way that sounded very Gollum-esque. He also seems to neither be playing for the good side or the evil side, just like Gollum. I have a theory about the end of the show that involves Rumpelstiltskin doing something self-serving that inadvertently helps good defeat evil, just like Gollum did with Frodo in
LOTR.
3. References to the Bible. This again is a similarity with
LOST. I have no idea about the religious backgrounds of writers Edward Kitsis and Adam Horowitz, but they clearly are familiar with the Bible/Torah. The last two episode titles have been "That Still Small Voice" (a reference to God's voice and Elijah) and "The Shepherd." "The Shepherd" dealt with the rise of a shepherd from small-town poverty and obscurity to becoming a prince who was threatened by the King. The major turning point was when the shepherd boy killed a gigantic beast with an unlikely technique--a clear reference to the Old Testament story of King David going from shepherd to Goliath-slayer, to enemy of King Saul, to King.
4. Great, great, great writing
The storytelling and screenwriting is just as high-quality as
LOST, as you would expect since it is the same writers. They employ so many little devices that I first learned about from
LOST, such as having a character serve as the proxy for the audience. In
LOST, whenever something unbelievable would happen, either Hurley or Sawyer would doubt it. That way, the audience would identify with the doubting character and slowly be won over to the idea. That's how they made time travel and smoke monsters believable. In OUAT, almost all the characters think the entire premise of the show is nonsense, which means that as the characters come around to it slowly, the audience gradually comes around as well. Great writing.
Another technique the writers have used was employed in last night's episode when they had Rumpelstiltskin's character say "Charming. Isn't it?" to Prince Charming. The character was using the word "Charming" as an adjective, not a name, but it could have been used as a name. This was the most blatant example of this writing technique I have ever seen, but it shows that the writers know how to use it, proving that when they did it earlier in the episode, it wasn't an accident.
In the earlier instance, one of the characters said something like "Good Lord!" to Emma Swan before saying a sentence or two to her. My High School English teacher pointed out that this is a sneaky technique used by screenwriters to identify the Messiah-character in the show/movie. The example he showed us was from the Matrix, where Trinity says "Jesus Christ..." to Neo. In context of the dialogue, it seems like a mere expletive, but in context of the story, it is a subtle way to identify the Messiah character. I always look for this writing technique, because I think it makes for really great writing, even if it might be breaking one of the Ten Commandments!
5. Dealing with major theological/philosophical themes from a (mostly) Judeo-Christian viewpoint. First off, the whole idea of the show is a bunch of people removed from a perfect world by "the Curse," who are in need of "a Savior." The Savior is prophesied to come and break the curse, returning the people to the perfect world they came from, and defeating evil once and for all in the process. That is pretty much the Bible in a nutshell.
Last night's episode dealt with the idea of free will. They didn't really delve into it, but they kept pointing out that Prince Charming had to make his own "free choice." I suspect that they are going to deal with free will and Fate in a very similar way to the movie
The Adjustment Bureau. I think that Rumpelstiltskin not only knows exactly what is going to happen, but that he takes actions to ensure those things happen. He made sure that Emma (the Messiah character) would come to the town and break the Curse by having her biological son be adopted by the evil queen. Just like the Adjustment Bureau, he made sure that the course of history stayed on track by manipulating the situation. I am betting that in the end of the show, someone will choose to do something against fate (Rumpelstiltskin), which will lead to his demise.
I am really looking forward to this show continuing. If you're not watching it, get caught up. It's a great show, and I hope it stays on the air for a good 5-6 years like
LOST did. There you have it. Watch
Once Upon A Time.